Re: [PATCH v28 6/7] drm/mediatek: add drm ovl_adaptor sub driver for MT8195

[Nancy Lin (林欣螢)]

Dear Nicolas,

Thanks for the review.

On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 17:24 -0500, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:24:12PM +0800, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> > Add drm ovl_adaptor sub driver. Bring up ovl_adaptor sub driver if
> > the component exists in the path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> [..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > index 30dcb65d8a5a..ce5617ad04cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> 
> [..]
> > @@ -897,22 +906,18 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device
> > *drm_dev,
> >  		crtc_i++;
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < path_len; i++) {
> > -		enum mtk_ddp_comp_id comp_id = path[i];
> > +		unsigned int comp_id = path[i];
> >  		struct device_node *node;
> > -		struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp;
> >  
> >  		node = priv->comp_node[comp_id];
> > -		comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id];
> > -
> > -		if (!node) {
> > -			dev_info(dev,
> > -				 "Not creating crtc %d because
> > component %d is disabled or missing\n",
> > -				 crtc_i, comp_id);
> > -			return 0;
> > -		}
> >  
> > -		if (!comp->dev) {
> > -			dev_err(dev, "Component %pOF not
> > initialized\n", node);
> > +		/* Not all drm components have a DTS device node, such
> > as ovl_adaptor,
> > +		 * which is the drm bring up sub driver
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!node && comp_id != DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR)
> > {
> > +			dev_err(dev,
> > +				"Not creating crtc %d because component
> > %d is disabled, missing or not initialized\n",
> > +				crtc_i, comp_id);
> >  			return -ENODEV;
> 
> Why do you change the behavior here? If !node, the return should be
> 0, because
> there are two separate data streams, for internal and external
> display, and they
> are optional. It should be possible to for example have the nodes for
> external
> display disabled in DT and still have the driver probe and have a
> working
> internal display. But with this change you're breaking that. Also,
> this message
> should stay as dev_info and not mention "not initialized", so
> basically it
> should stay the same as before the change.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nícolas

Yes, You are right. This is my mistake. I should not change this
behavior. I will fix it and modify as following for the ovl_adaptor sub
driver component, which don't have dts device node.

@@ -905,7 +914,10 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device
*drm_dev,
                node = priv->comp_node[comp_id];
                comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id];

-               if (!node) {
+               /* Not all drm components have a DTS device node, such
as ovl_adaptor,
+                * which is the drm bring up sub driver
+                */
+               if (!node && comp_id != DDP_COMPONENT_DRM_OVL_ADAPTOR)
{
                        dev_info(dev,
                                 "Not creating crtc %d because
component %d is disabled or missing\n",
                                 crtc_i, comp_id);
@@ -938,7 +950,7 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
        }

Regards,
Nancy