Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igbvf: Regard vf reset nack as success

[Akihiko Odaki]

Hi,

On 2022/11/22 23:17, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Akihiko,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
>
> Am 22.11.22 um 10:27 schrieb Akihiko Odaki:
> > vf reset nack actually represents the reset operation itself is
> > performed but no address is not assigned. Therefore, e1000_reset_hw_vf
>
> Is … no … not assigned … intentional?
>
> > should fill the "perm_addr" with the zero address and return success on
> > such an occassion. This prevents its callers in netdev.c from saying PF
>
> occasion

I have just sent v2 with the message fixed.

> > still resetting, and instead allows them to correctly report that no
> > address is assigned.
>
> In what environment do you hit the problem?

I found this bug when I was developing a QEMU patch to emulate 82576.

Regards,
Akihiko Odaki

> […]
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul