On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 02:20:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+/**Would it make sense to itereate CPUs within the helper rather than asking
+ * cgroup_rstat_css_flush - flush stats for the given css and cpu
+ * @css: target css to be flush
+ * @cpu: the cpu that holds the stats to be flush
+ *
+ * A lightweight rstat flush operation for a given css and cpu.
+ * Only the cpu_lock is being held for mutual exclusion, the cgroup_rstat_lock
+ * isn't used.
+ */
+void cgroup_rstat_css_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
+{
+ raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock, cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(cpu_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(cpu_lock);
+}
the caller to do it? Also, in terms of patch sequencing, this introduces a
bug and then fixes it. Prolly better to not introduce the bug in the first
place.
Thanks.