Re: [PATCH] kvm/arm: Fix pvtime documentation

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Thu Nov 03 2022 - 11:43:14 EST


On Thu, 03 Nov 2022 13:55:29 +0000,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/22 20:12, Usama Arif wrote:
> > This includes table format and using reST labels for
> > cross-referencing to vcpu.rst.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is not what people normally do when given suggestion diff like
> what I sent before [1]. Instead, they just apply and squash the
> suggestion (while also applying requested changes from reviewers).

No, this is the correct course of action. There isn't any point in
having an *unrelated* change in a separate series. This is a
standalone change, posted as a standalone patch.

> Please reroll your series [2] with suggestion applied.

Or not.

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.