On 03:02-20221101, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
Drop RNG clock property as it is not controlled by rng-driver.
Does'nt tell me what is the alternative? why is the hardware description
not sufficient for control?
https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/am65x_sr2/clocks.html#clocks-for-sa2-ul0-device
Looks like a perfectly valid description - do we have a bug and firmware
does'nt allow control here?
Fixes: b366b2409c97 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am6: Add crypto accelarator node")
Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi
index 4005a73cfea9..e166d7b7e3a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi
@@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ rng: rng@4e10000 {
compatible = "inside-secure,safexcel-eip76";
reg = <0x0 0x4e10000 0x0 0x7d>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
- clocks = <&k3_clks 136 1>;
Does this mean that the crypto module's power-domains property should be
dropped as well?
status = "disabled"; /* Used by OP-TEE */
};
};
--
2.25.1