Re: [PATCH 10/11] usb: host: xhci-tegra: Add Tegra234 XHCI support

From: Jon Hunter
Date: Tue Nov 01 2022 - 10:54:12 EST


On 28/10/2022 14:39, Thierry Reding wrote:

...

+static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra234_soc = {
+ .firmware = "nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin",
+ .supply_names = tegra194_supply_names,
+ .num_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_supply_names),
+ .phy_types = tegra194_phy_types,
+ .num_types = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_phy_types),
+ .context = &tegra186_xusb_context,
+ .ports = {
+ .usb3 = { .offset = 0, .count = 4, },
+ .usb2 = { .offset = 4, .count = 4, },
+ },
+ .scale_ss_clock = false,
+ .has_ipfs = false,
+ .otg_reset_sspi = false,
+ .ops = &tegra234_ops,
+ .mbox = {
+ .cmd = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
+ .data_in = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
+ .data_out = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
+ .owner = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
+ .smi_intr = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_SMI_INTR,
+ },
+ .lpm_support = true,
+ .has_bar2 = true,
+ .has_ifr = true,
+};
+MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin");

Can you prepare a patch to add this firmware to the linux-firmware
repository? I don't see it there yet.


Actually, we should remove the MODULE_FIRMWARE completely for Tegra234. Per the commit message the variable 'has_ifr' is used to indicate if the firmware is loaded by calling request_firmware() or via these IFR registers. I wonder if we need this 'has_ifr' variable if we should just avoid setting the 'firmware' variable for Tegra234 and use this instead of the 'has_ifr'?

Jon

--
nvpublic