Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: Fix UniPhier SATA controller node names in example

From: Kunihiko Hayashi
Date: Tue Nov 01 2022 - 05:10:55 EST


Hi Rob,

On 2022/10/29 4:38, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:49:20PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
The word "glue" is ambiguous for the controller node name. Should put
"sata-controller" instead of "ahci-glue" on the controller node.
And rename a phy node to "sata-phy".

Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
index a3cd45acea28..89b8b133777a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
yaml
@@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
- ahci-glue@65700000 {
+ sata-controller@65700000 {

But is this really the SATA controller aka AHCI?

In cases where we don't have a standardized name, I don't think it makes
sense changing node names from one non-standard name to another.

I see. This can't be named generic, so this change will drop.
And "sata-phy" in the same way.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi