Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move from git://github.com to https://github.com

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Oct 13 2022 - 13:09:00 EST


On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:32:58AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > Github deprecated the git:// links about a year ago, but it looks like
> > there's still a handful of them in the MAINTAINERS file. Conor pointed
> > this out about the RISC-V KVM tree, but I figured it'd be better to just
> > fix them all -- I've got a bunch of insteadOf so I didn't even notice
> > the deprecation, but new contributors probably don't and might get a bit
> > confused.
> >
> > Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/
> > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > @@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ M: Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > M: Scott Branden <sbranden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > R: Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > S: Maintained
> > -T: git git://github.com/broadcom/mach-bcm
> > +T: git https://github.com/broadcom/mach-bcm
>
> This link is dead, I can't find a repo with that name on their GitHub
> profile.
> @Florian, should this be updated to the stblinux repo instead?
>
> > F: arch/arm/mach-bcm/
> > N: bcm281*
> > N: bcm113*
> > @@ -4055,7 +4055,7 @@ M: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> > R: Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > L: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > S: Maintained
> > -T: git git://github.com/broadcom/stblinux.git
> > +T: git https://github.com/broadcom/stblinux.git
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
> > F: arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7*.dts*
> > F: arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-b15-rac.h
>
> Other than that, I clicked all the links - some look dead but that's not
> the point of this patch..

I realised I should clarify: s/some look dead/some look abandoned. Only
the one I pointed out above is actually a 404.

>
> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>