Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: use update_mmu_tlb() on the second thread

[David Hildenbrand]

On 30.09.22 10:43, Qi Zheng wrote:
> On 2022/9/30 16:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 29.09.22 13:23, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > > As message in commit 7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB
> > > if PTE entry exists") said, we should update local TLB only on the
> > > second thread. So in the do_anonymous_page() here, we should use
> > > update_mmu_tlb() instead of update_mmu_cache() on the second thread.
> >
> > Maybe mention here "This only affects performance, but not correctness."
>
> Oh, this is better. Hi Andrew, do I need to resend the v4?

I assume he can squash it, most probably no need to resend. :)

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb