On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 23.09.22 um 11:18 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 22.09.22 um 16:25 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
+ drm_dbg_kms(dev,
+ "Generating a %ux%u%c, %u-line mode with a %lu kHz clock\n",
+ hactive, vactive,
+ interlace ? 'i' : 'p',
+ params->num_lines,
+ pixel_clock_hz / 1000);
Divide by HZ_PER_KHZ here and in other places.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/units.h#L23
From the Department of Bikeshedding:
I find "pixel_clock_hz / 1000" has much more clarity than
"pixel_clock_hz / HZ_PER_KHZ".
This one's easy to see because it tells you with the _hz postfix. Many
places don't and then it quickly gets confusing what units the code's
converting.
So if I add it to places that don't have it explicitly (ie, tests) would
that be acceptable to both of you?
Maxime
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature