[PATCH 5.4 115/120] xfs: use bitops interface for buf log item AIL flag check

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 826f7e34130a4ce756138540170cbe935c537a47 upstream.

The xfs_log_item flags were converted to atomic bitops as of commit
22525c17ed ("xfs: log item flags are racy"). The assert check for
AIL presence in xfs_buf_item_relse() still uses the old value based
check. This likely went unnoticed as XFS_LI_IN_AIL evaluates to 0
and causes the assert to unconditionally pass. Fix up the check.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 22525c17ed ("xfs: log item flags are racy")
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_relse(
 	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip = bp->b_log_item;
 
 	trace_xfs_buf_item_relse(bp, _RET_IP_);
-	ASSERT(!(bip->bli_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL));
+	ASSERT(!test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL, &bip->bli_item.li_flags));
 
 	bp->b_log_item = NULL;
 	if (list_empty(&bp->b_li_list))