Re: [GIT PULL] RISC-V Fixes for 6.0-rc6

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:09:21 PDT (-0700), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 8:31 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have one merge conflict as a result of a treewide fix, I'm getting some odd
> > output from just showing the merge (it's showing some of the fix too), but I
> > think the merge itself is OK.  My fix is to keep the write lock
> >
> > -       mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > ++      mmap_write_lock(mm);
> >  +      ret = walk_page_range_novma(mm, start, end, &pageattr_ops, NULL,
> >  +                                  &masks);
> > -       mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > ++      mmap_write_unlock(mm);
>
> Yes, thatr's the proper merge resolution.
>
> HOWEVER.
>
> Looking at the *callers* of this new __set_memory_mm(), this is all
> completely bogus and broken.
>
> In particular, fix_kernel_mem_early() does that call under rcu_read_lock().
>
> You can't do that. Not with the read-lock, and not with the
> write-lock. You simply cannot (and must not) block while in a
> read-side critical section, and trying to take any sleeping lock -
> whether for reading or for writing - is just completely wrong.
>
> So I'm not doing this pull. The merge resolution is trivial, but the
> code is simply wrong.

Sorry about that, it's pretty brain-dead.  I'd love to blame this one on 
the lack of sleep over the past week or two, but I'm a bit too tired to 
commit to that.  Either way I'll go sort it out, but not for this week 
-- I don't think anything else was super critical, so it shouldn't be 
that big of a problem.