Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add basic soc dtsi

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 11/09/2022 11:09, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/11/22 11:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/09/2022 16:32, Iskren Chernev wrote:
>>> Add support for Qualcomm SM6115 SoC. This includes:
>>> - GCC
>>> - Pinctrl
>>> - RPM (CC+PD)
>>> - USB
>>> - MMC
>>> - UFS
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> pending issues with dtschema:
>>> - for some reason, using pinctrl phandles (in mmc) breaks the pinctrl
>>>   schema (4 times)
>>>       .output/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb: pinctrl@500000: sdc1-on-state: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>>>             'pins' is a required property
>>>             'clk', 'cmd', 'data', 'rclk' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>             [[26]] is not of type 'object'
>>>             From schema: /home/iskren/src/pmos/linux-postmarketos/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm6115-pinctrl.yaml
>>
>> It's the same as 06367559766b7c9bd96d2baef8bfc5a9bb451e25. I propose to
>> fix it the same way. I can do a biger change for all pinctrls, so here
>> you would need to add "-pins" prefix to entries (see patch
>> 4fcdaf4b0320f93d0ccb4d36b795ed258fb07b27).
> 
> OK, that makes sense. One thing that is a bit odd -- the current pattern
> "(pinconf|-pins)$" matches anything that ends in pinconf OR -pins (so it could
> be sth-pinconf). 

Yeah, I am fixing it to ^(pinconf|.*-pins)$

> Also, if you only have a single block, isn't the idea to just
> list it in the -states node.  I mean we either force everybody to nest with
> a pinconf, or we allow -pins for nested stuff and directly in -state for the
> non-nested. Just my 2c.

I didn't get this one... We allow exactly this, don't we (in PMIC GPIOs)?


Best regards,
Krzysztof