Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: fix to return errno if kmalloc() fails

From: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Date: Fri Sep 09 2022 - 16:21:57 EST


On 9/9/22 22:06, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:25:08PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
>> > I tend to agree with you. A mount operation shouldn’t panic the
>> > kernel.
>>
>> Hmm kmalloc(64) shouldn't normally due that due to the the underlying page
>> allocation falling into the "too small to fail" category, wonder if
>> syzkaller was doing anything special here?
>
> Here's the repro:
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17cd7fa3080000
>
> you can see it does:
>
> fd = open("/proc/thread-self/fail-nth", O_RDWR);
> if (fd == -1)
> exit(1);
> char buf[16];
> sprintf(buf, "%d", nth);
> if (write(fd, buf, strlen(buf)) != (ssize_t)strlen(buf))
>
> so this is the kind of stupid nitpicky bug that we shouldn't be
> reporting, let alone fixing, IMO.

Ah, thanks.

Well I'm ok with eventually removing all such BUG_ONs including what
Christophe Jaillet suggested, but it certainly isn't urgent nor deserves Cc:
stable then.