Re: [PATCH net] net: tun: limit first seg size to avoid oversized linearization

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri Sep 09 2022 - 12:36:19 EST


On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:56 PM Ziyang Xuan
<william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Recently, we found a syzkaller problem as following:
>
> ========================================================
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 17965 at mm/page_alloc.c:5295 __alloc_pages+0x1308/0x16c4 mm/page_alloc.c:5295
> ...
> Call trace:
> __alloc_pages+0x1308/0x16c4 mm/page_alloc.c:5295
> __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:550 [inline]
> alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:564 [inline]
> kmalloc_large_node+0x94/0x350 mm/slub.c:4038
> __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x620/0x8e4 mm/slub.c:4545
> __kmalloc_reserve.constprop.0+0x1e4/0x2b0 net/core/skbuff.c:151
> pskb_expand_head+0x130/0x8b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1654
> __skb_grow include/linux/skbuff.h:2779 [inline]
> tun_napi_alloc_frags+0x144/0x610 drivers/net/tun.c:1477
> tun_get_user+0x31c/0x2010 drivers/net/tun.c:1835
> tun_chr_write_iter+0x98/0x100 drivers/net/tun.c:2036
>
> It is because the first seg size of the iov_iter from user space is
> very big, it is 2147479538 which is bigger than the threshold value
> for bail out early in __alloc_pages(). And skb->pfmemalloc is true,
> __kmalloc_reserve() would use pfmemalloc reserves without __GFP_NOWARN
> flag. Thus we got a warning.
>
> I noticed that non-first segs size are required less than PAGE_SIZE in
> tun_napi_alloc_frags(). The first seg should not be a special case, and
> oversized linearization is also unreasonable. Limit the first seg size to
> PAGE_SIZE to avoid oversized linearization.
>
> Fixes: 90e33d459407 ("tun: enable napi_gro_frags() for TUN/TAP driver")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 259b2b84b2b3..7db515f94667 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1454,12 +1454,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_napi_alloc_frags(struct tun_file *tfile,
> size_t len,
> const struct iov_iter *it)
> {
> + size_t linear = iov_iter_single_seg_count(it);
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> - size_t linear;
> int err;
> int i;
>
> - if (it->nr_segs > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)
> + if (it->nr_segs > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 || linear > PAGE_SIZE)
> return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
>

This does not look good to me.

Some drivers allocate 9KB+ for 9000 MTU, in a single allocation,
because the hardware is not SG capable in RX.

> local_bh_disable();
> @@ -1468,7 +1468,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_napi_alloc_frags(struct tun_file *tfile,
> if (!skb)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - linear = iov_iter_single_seg_count(it);
> err = __skb_grow(skb, linear);
> if (err)
> goto free;
> --
> 2.25.1
>