Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] dt-bindings: net: altera: tse: add an optional pcs register range

From: Maxime Chevallier
Date: Tue Aug 30 2022 - 15:18:50 EST


On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:14:52 +0300
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 30/08/2022 12:55, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Some implementations of the TSE have their PCS as an external bloc,
> > exposed at its own register range. Document this, and add a new
> > example showing a case using the pcs and the new phylink conversion
> > to connect an sfp port to a TSE mac.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V1->V2 :
> > - Fixed example
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/altr,tse.yaml | 29
> > ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,tse.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,tse.yaml index
> > 1676e13b8c64..4b314861a831 100644 ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,tse.yaml +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,tse.yaml @@ -39,6
> > +39,7 @@ allOf: properties:
> > reg:
> > minItems: 6
> > + maxItems: 7
> > reg-names:
> > minItems: 6
> > items:
> > @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ allOf:
> > - const: rx_resp
> > - const: tx_csr
> > - const: tx_desc
> > + - const: pcs
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > @@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ properties:
> >
> > reg:
> > minItems: 4
> > - maxItems: 6
> > + maxItems: 7
> >
> > reg-names:
> > minItems: 4
> > @@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ properties:
> > - const: rx_resp
> > - const: tx_csr
> > - const: tx_desc
> > + - const: pcs
> > - const: s1
> >
>
> So now 8 items?

I'll also remove that. My understanding was that on top of the
allOf:if/then, I was supposed to re-list all possible values. I got
that wrong, so that's not needed at all.

>
> > interrupts:
> > @@ -122,6 +125,30 @@ required:
> > unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > examples:
> > + - |
> > + tse_sub_0: ethernet@c0100000 {
> > + compatible = "altr,tse-msgdma-1.0";
> > + reg = <0xc0100000 0x00000400>,
> > + <0xc0101000 0x00000020>,
> > + <0xc0102000 0x00000020>,
> > + <0xc0103000 0x00000008>,
> > + <0xc0104000 0x00000020>,
> > + <0xc0105000 0x00000020>,
> > + <0xc0106000 0x00000100>;
> > + reg-names = "control_port", "rx_csr", "rx_desc",
> > "rx_resp", "tx_csr", "tx_desc", "pcs";
> > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> > + interrupts = <0 44 4>,<0 45 4>;
> > + interrupt-names = "rx_irq","tx_irq";
> > + rx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
> > + tx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
> > + max-frame-size = <1500>;
> > + local-mac-address = [ 00 0C ED 00 00 02 ];
>
> 00 00 00 00 00 00
> (easier to spot that it is invalid)

Ack, thanks !

Best regards,

Maxime

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof