Re: [PATCH v2 11/25] usb: gadget: f_tcm: Execute command on write completion

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2022-08-29 21:47:41 [+0000], Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Ok. Maybe we should make a change in the target_execute_cmd() then. It
> seems unreasonable to force the caller to workaround this such as the
> wait+complete construct you did (and I don't recall we have changes in
> place to know/guarantee that interrupts are enabled before executing
> target_execute_cmd() previously either).

Sounds reasonable. Back then I wasn't sure if I'm putting all the puzzle
pieces correctly together so I preferred this over a target change I
wasn't sure was really needed. Anyway.

> For the dwc3, we masked the interrupt at this point, so interrupt won't
> be asserted here.

dwc3 has a irqrestore() after calling the routine so that will avoid the
splat. But lockdep should yell here.
Anyway, other interrupts on that CPU (timer for instance) could trigger.

> Thanks,
> Thinh

Sebastian