How about 'out_destory_workqueue' ?-----Original Message-----It's not so good that the label 'destroy_workqueue' is the same as function name.
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 9:38 PM
To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tony0620emma@xxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx; Bernie Huang <phhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH -next] wifi: rtw88: add missing destroy_workqueue() on error path in rtw_core_init()
Add the missing destroy_workqueue() before return from rtw_core_init()
in error path.
Fixes: fe101716c7c9 ("rtw88: replace tx tasklet with work queue")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
index 790dcfed1125..557213e52761 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ int rtw_core_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
ret = rtw_load_firmware(rtwdev, RTW_NORMAL_FW);
if (ret) {
rtw_warn(rtwdev, "no firmware loaded\n");
- return ret;
+ goto destroy_workqueue;
}
if (chip->wow_fw_name) {
@@ -2104,11 +2104,15 @@ int rtw_core_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
wait_for_completion(&rtwdev->fw.completion);
if (rtwdev->fw.firmware)
release_firmware(rtwdev->fw.firmware);
- return ret;
+ goto destroy_workqueue;
}
}
return 0;
+
+destroy_workqueue:
I suggest to just use 'out' instead.
+ destroy_workqueue(rtwdev->tx_wq);.
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_core_init);
--
2.25.1
------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.