Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: irqchip: imx mu work as msi controller

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:51:29AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> I.MX mu support generate irq by write a register. Provide msi controller
> support so other driver such as PCI EP can use it by standard msi
> interface as doorbell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml      | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..ac07b138e24c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Freescale/NXP i.MX Messaging Unit (MU) work as msi controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The Messaging Unit module enables two processors within the SoC to
> +  communicate and coordinate by passing messages (e.g. data, status
> +  and control) through the MU interface. The MU also provides the ability
> +  for one processor (A side) to signal the other processor (B side) using
> +  interrupts.
> +
> +  Because the MU manages the messaging between processors, the MU uses
> +  different clocks (from each side of the different peripheral buses).
> +  Therefore, the MU must synchronize the accesses from one side to the
> +  other. The MU accomplishes synchronization using two sets of matching
> +  registers (Processor A-facing, Processor B-facing).
> +
> +  MU can work as msi interrupt controller to do doorbell
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - fsl,imx6sx-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx7ulp-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx8ulp-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx8ulp-mu-msi-s4
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: a side register base address
> +      - description: b side register base address
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: processor a-facing
> +      - const: processor b-facing

Isn't 'a' and 'b' sufficient to distinguish? Personally, doesn't really 
look like a case that benefits from -names at all.

In any case, -names shouldn't have spaces.

> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    description: a side interrupt number.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    items:
> +      - description: a side power domain
> +      - description: b side power domain
> +
> +  power-domain-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: processor a-facing
> +      - const: processor b-facing

Same here.

> +
> +  interrupt-controller: true
> +
> +  msi-controller: true
> +
> +  "#msi-cells":
> +    const: 0
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - interrupt-controller
> +  - msi-controller

#msi-cells should be required.

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/firmware/imx/rsrc.h>
> +
> +    msi-controller@5d270000 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu-msi";
> +        msi-controller;
> +        #msi-cells = <0>;
> +        interrupt-controller;
> +        reg = <0x5d270000 0x10000>,     /* A side */
> +              <0x5d300000 0x10000>;     /* B side */
> +        reg-names = "processor a-facing", "processor b-facing";
> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 191 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +        power-domains = <&pd IMX_SC_R_MU_12A>,
> +                        <&pd IMX_SC_R_MU_12B>;
> +        power-domain-names = "processor a-facing", "processor b-facing";
> +    };
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 
>