Re: [GIT PULL] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Thu Aug 18 2022 - 17:24:06 EST


On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:10:54 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


On 18/08/2022 22:03, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:14:55 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hey Will/Palmer/Sudeep,

Catalin suggested [0] dropping the CC: stable for the arm64 patch and
instead making it a specific prereq of the RISC-V patch & making a PR,
so here we are.. I was still up when -rc1 came out so pushed it last
night to get the test coverage, but LKP seems to not have reported a
build success since early on the 13th so not holding my horses! I built
it again for both ARMs and RISC-V myself.

I tagged it tonight, so it's on conor/linux.git as riscv-topo-on-6.0-rc1
with the prereq specified.

Not sure if you want to merge this too Sudeep or if that's up to Greg?

It's a little bit vague what you're asking for here, so I'm just
going to kind of guessing here but this on riscv/for-next. I'm not
sure if you were looking for me to just merge the arch/riscv bits or
if this should be on fixes (just looking at the patch makes it look
like it should be), but I don't want to send up some arm64 code to
fixes without it being pretty explicit that I should do so

Ahh sorry, I completely forgot to mention that Will said "for 5.21" in
his response to my original patchset. for-next sounds fine to me - all
in-tree devicetrees had the optional properties added to them that solve
the issue - and they were AUTOSEL'ed too from what I can see.

OK, sounds like we're good then.


Thanks & sorry!
Conor.


Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> # arch/riscv bits, for 6.0-rc

in case someone else wants to send it up before I get back to this,
I'm fine either way.

Thanks!


Thanks,
Conor.

0 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/Ytac7G1zlq6WW4jt@xxxxxxx/

The following changes since commit 568035b01cfb107af8d2e4bd2fb9aea22cf5b868:

  Linux 6.0-rc1 (2022-08-14 15:50:18 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/ tags/riscv-topo-on-6.0-rc1

for you to fetch changes up to fbd92809997a391f28075f1c8b5ee314c225557c:

  riscv: topology: fix default topology reporting (2022-08-15 22:07:34 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fix RISC-V's topology reporting

The goal here is the fix the incorrectly reported arch topology on
RISC-V which seems to have been broken since it was added.
cpu, package and thread IDs are all currently reported as -1, so tools
like lstopo think systems have multiple threads on the same core when
this is not true:
https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/issues/536

arm64's topology code basically applies to RISC-V too, so it has been
made generic along with the removal of MPIDR related code, which
appears to be redudant code since '3102bc0e6ac7 ("arm64: topology: Stop
using MPIDR for topology information")' replaced the code that actually
interacted with MPIDR with default values.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Conor Dooley (2):
      arm64: topology: move store_cpu_topology() to shared code
      riscv: topology: fix default topology reporting

 arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 40 ----------------------------------------
 arch/riscv/Kconfig           |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c  |  3 ++-
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv