Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface

[Jesse Brandeburg]

On 8/17/2022 10:58 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit
> from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut
> it).
>
> The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and
> being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't
> require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of
> one wild macro).
>
> Patch 5/5 is just there to showcase how the thing would be used. If this doesn't
> get hated on, I'll let Tariq pick this up and push it with his networking driver
> changes (with actual changelogs).

I am interested in this work, but it seems that at least on lore and in 
my inbox, patch 3,4,5 didn't show up.