Re: [next] arm64: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:622 - Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 - pc : clear_inode
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Aug 16 2022 - 22:01:07 EST
Hi Naresh,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 01:09:40 +0530 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 00:40, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:00 PM Naresh Kamboju
> > <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Following kernel BUG found while booting arm64 Qcom dragonboard 410c with
> > > Linux next-20220816 kernel Image.
> >
> > What kind of environment is this?
> >
> > Havign that inode list corruption makes it smell a *bit* like the
> > crazy memory corruption that we saw with the google cloud instances,
> > but that would only happen wif you actually use VIRTIO for your
> > environment?
>
> This is a physical hardware db410c device.
> Following VIRTIO configs enabled.
>
> CONFIG_BLK_MQ_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_NET_9P_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=y
> CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_ANCHOR=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LIB_LEGACY=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_MENU=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=y
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_VIRTIO=y
>
>
> >
> > Do you see the same issue with plain v6.0-rc1?
>
> Nope. I do not notice reported BUG on v6.0-rc1.
Is it reliable enough that you could possibly do a bisection between
v6.0-rc1 and next-20220816?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp7nEFBbuAK4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature