Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] cxl/mem: Implement Get Event Records command

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Aug 16 2022 - 12:41:26 EST


On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:39:58 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > + record_count = le16_to_cpu(payload.record_count);
> > + if (record_count > 0)
> > + trace_cxl_event(dev_name(cxlds->dev), type,
> > + &payload.record);
> > +
> > + if (payload.flags & CXL_GET_EVENT_FLAG_OVERFLOW)
> > + trace_cxl_event_overflow(dev_name(cxlds->dev), type,
> > + &payload);
>
> If you want to avoid the compare operations when the tracepoints are not
> enabled, you can add:
>
> if (trace_cxl_event_enabled()) {
> if (record_count > 0)
> trace_cxl_event(dev_name(cxlds->dev), type,
> &payload.record);
> }
>
> if (trace_cxl_event_overflow_enabled()) {
> if (payload.flags & CXL_GET_EVENT_FLAG_OVERFLOW)
> trace_cxl_event_overflow(dev_name(cxlds->dev), type,
> &payload);
> }
>
> Those "<tracepoint>_enabled()" functions are static branches. Which means
> when not enabled it's a nop that skips this code, and when either is
> enabled, it turns into a jump to the contents of the if block.

Ignore this suggestion. I see in the second patch you add more logic to the
if condition. Only use this suggestion if the logic is only for when the
tracepoint is enabled.

-- Steve