Re: [PATCH net-next,0/3] cleanup of qdisc offload function

[shaozhengchao]

On 2022/8/16 11:10, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:04:20 +0800 Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> > Some qdiscs don't care return value of qdisc offload function, so make
> > function void.
>
> How many of these patches do you have? Is there a goal you're working
> towards? I don't think the pure return value removals are worth the
> noise. They don't even save LoC:
>
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Hi Jakub.
	Thank you for your reply. Recently I've been studying the kernel code 
related to qdisc, and my goal is to understand how qdisc works. If the 
code can be optimized, I do what I can to modify the optimization. Is it 
more appropriate to add warning to the offload return value? I look 
forward to your reply. Thank you.

Zhengchao Shao