Re: [PATCH 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add compatible name for SC7280 ADSP

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 03/08/2022 17:21, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Update adsp pil data and compatible name for loading ADSP
> binary on SC7280 based platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> index 2f3b9f5..bb4494c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> @@ -697,6 +697,24 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_resource_init = {
>   	},
>   };
>   
> +static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_sc7280_resource_init = {
> +	.crash_reason_smem = 423,
> +	.firmware_name = "adsp.mbn",
> +	.load_state = "adsp",
> +	.ssr_name = "lpass",
> +	.sysmon_name = "adsp",
> +	.ssctl_id = 0x14,
> +	.is_wpss = false,
> +	.auto_boot = true,
> +	.clk_ids = (const char*[]) {
> +		"gcc_cfg_noc_lpass", NULL

The clock is not mentioned in dt bindings.

> +	},
> +	.num_clks = 1,
> +	.proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
> +		NULL
> +	},

Is the empty array necessary?

> +};
> +
>   static const struct adsp_pil_data cdsp_resource_init = {
>   	.crash_reason_smem = 601,
>   	.firmware_name = "cdsp.mdt",
> @@ -737,6 +755,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil", .data = &cdsp_resource_init },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil", .data = &wpss_resource_init },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-adsp-pil", .data = &adsp_resource_init },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-adsp-pil", .data = &adsp_sc7280_resource_init },
>   	{ },
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adsp_of_match);


--
With best wishes
Dmitry