Re: [PATCH v9 12/27] rust: add `kernel` crate

[Konstantin Shelekhin]

On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 01:22:52PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > I sense possible problems here. It's common for a kernel code to pass
> > flags during memory allocations.
> 
> Yes, of course. We will support this, but how exactly it will look
> like, to what extent upstream Rust's `alloc` could support our use
> cases, etc. has been on discussion for a long time.
> 
> For instance, see https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/815 for
> a potential extension trait approach with no allocator carried on the
> type that Andreas wrote after a discussion in the last informal call:
> 
>     let a = Box::try_new_atomic(101)?;

IMO it's just easier to always pass flags like this:

  let a = Box::try_new(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, 101)?;

But if allocate_with_flags() will be somehow present in the API that's
just what we need.

P.S. Thanks for a quick reply!