RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Change mov $0, %reg with xor %reg, %reg

[David Laight]

From: Kanna Scarlet
> Sent: 04 August 2022 19:08
> 
> On 8/4/22 10:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Bonus points if you find out what other advantage
> >
> > XOR reg,reg
> >
> > has when it comes to clearing integer registers.
> 
> Hello sir Borislav,
> 
> Thank you for your response. I tried to find out other advantages of
> xor reg,reg on Google and found this:
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/33668295/7275114
> 
>   "xor (being a recognized zeroing idiom, unlike mov reg, 0) has some
>   obvious and some subtle advantages:
> 
>   1. smaller code-size than mov reg,0. (All CPUs)
>   2. avoids partial-register penalties for later code.
>      (Intel P6-family and SnB-family).
>   3. doesn't use an execution unit, saving power and freeing up
>      execution resources. (Intel SnB-family)
>   4. smaller uop (no immediate data) leaves room in the uop cache-line
>      for nearby instructions to borrow if needed. (Intel SnB-family).
>   5. doesn't use up entries in the physical register file. (Intel
>      SnB-family (and P4) at least, possibly AMD as well since they use
>      a similar PRF design instead of keeping register state in the ROB
>      like Intel P6-family microarchitectures.)"

You missed one, and an additional change:

Use "xor %rax,%rax" instead of "xor %eax,%eax" to save
the 'reg' prefix.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)