RE: [PATCH 0/2] Macb PTP enhancements

[Katakam, Harini]

Hi Jakub,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 8:05 AM
> To: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx; claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andrei.pistirica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx;
> harinikatakamlinux@xxxxxxxxx; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>;
> Katakam, Harini <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; Pandey, Radhey Shyam
> <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Macb PTP enhancements
> 
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:13:44 +0530 Harini Katakam wrote:
> > From: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > This series is a follow up for patches 2 and 3 from a previous series:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca4c97c9-1117-a465-5202-e1bf276fe75b@micro
> > chip.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517135525.GC3344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Sorry for the delay.
> >
> > ACK is added only to patch 3 (now patch 2).
> > Patch 1 is updated with check for gem_has_ptp as per Claudiu's comments.
> 
> These were separated from the earlier series as non-fixes, right?
> But we are in the period of merge window right now, when all the new
> features flow to Linus's tree and we only take fixes to avoid conflicts and give
> maintainers time to settle the existing ones.
> So these need to wait until -rc1 is cut. (Or is patch 1 a bug fix?
> I can't tell.)

Sorry, I missed the window. Yes, both are non-fixes and I'll resend after the
Tree is open.

Regards,
Harini