On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:58:39AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:41:14 PDT (-0700), shorne@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The asm/pci.h used for many newer architectures share similar
> definitions. Move the common parts to asm-generic/pci.h to allow for
> sharing code.
>
> Two things to note are:
>
> - isa_dma_bridge_buggy, traditionally this is defined in asm/dma.h but
> these architectures avoid creating that file and add the definition
> to asm/pci.h.
> - ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE, csky does not define this so we
> undefine it after including asm-generic/pci.h. Why doesn't csky
> define it?
> - pci_get_legacy_ide_irq, This function is only used on architectures
> that support PNP. It is only maintained for arm64, in other
> architectures it is removed.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a0JmPeczfmMBE__vn=Jbvf=nkbpVaZCycyv40pZNCJJXQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Second note on isa_dma_bridge_buggy, this is set on x86 but it it also set in
> pci/quirks.c. We discussed limiting it only to x86 though as its a general
> quick triggered by pci ids I think it will be more tricky than we thought so I
> will leave as is. It might be nice to move it out of asm/dma.h and into
> asm/pci.h though.
>
> Since v2:
> - Nothing
> Since v1:
> - Remove definition of pci_get_legacy_ide_irq
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 12 +++---------
> arch/csky/include/asm/pci.h | 24 ++++--------------------
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h | 25 +++----------------------
> arch/um/include/asm/pci.h | 24 ++----------------------
> include/asm-generic/pci.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/pci.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> index b33ca260e3c9..1180e83712f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> #define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0x1000
> -#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 0
>
> /*
> * Set to 1 if the kernel should re-assign all PCI bus numbers
> @@ -18,9 +17,6 @@
> (pci_has_flag(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS))
>
> #define arch_can_pci_mmap_wc() 1
> -#define ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE 1
> -
> -extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
> @@ -28,11 +24,9 @@ static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
> /* no legacy IRQ on arm64 */
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> -
> -static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> -{
> - return 1;
> -}
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
>
> +/* Generic PCI */
> +#include <asm-generic/pci.h>
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_PCI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/pci.h
> index ebc765b1f78b..44866c1ad461 100644
> --- a/arch/csky/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -9,26 +9,10 @@
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> -#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0
> -#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 0
> +/* Generic PCI */
> +#include <asm-generic/pci.h>
>
> -/* C-SKY shim does not initialize PCI bus */
> -#define pcibios_assign_all_busses() 1
> -
> -extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> -static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
> -{
> - /* no legacy IRQ on csky */
> - return -ENODEV;
> -}
> -
> -static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> -{
> - /* always show the domain in /proc */
> - return 1;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
> +/* csky doesn't use generic pci resource mapping */
> +#undef ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE
>
> #endif /* __ASM_CSKY_PCI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> index 7fd52a30e605..12ce8150cfb0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -12,29 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
>
> -#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0
> -#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 0
My for-next changes these in bb356ddb78b2 ("RISC-V: PCI: Avoid handing out
address 0 to devices"). Do you mind either splitting out the arch/riscv
bits or having this in via some sort of shared tag?
Hi Palmer,
I replied last on my phone but since it produces HTML multi-part email it got
rejected from a few places and I am not sure if you saw my reply.
It might be a bit hard to separate out the architecture specific bits as it
requires a bit of coordination with the asm-generic/pci.h move.
Some options:
1 I can produce a tag for you to merge into your for-next.
2 I can skip touching riscv at all in this patch and you can take care of it
in a future patch.
3 I could cherry pick your change bb356ddb78b2 ("RISC-V: PCI: Avoid handing out
address 0 to devices") to my for-next branch. It should help avoid conflict.
Seeing that I am still doing small updates here and there I am not sure when I
will be ablt to create a stable tag. So maybe 3 would work best?
-Stafford