Re: [PATCH 3/3] 9p: Add mempools for RPCs

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 12:38:46PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > @@ -270,10 +276,8 @@ p9_tag_alloc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, unsigned int max_size)
> >  	if (!req)
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  
> > -	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->tc, alloc_msize))
> > -		goto free_req;
> > -	if (p9_fcall_init(c, &req->rc, alloc_msize))
> > -		goto free;
> > +	p9_fcall_init(c, &req->tc, 0, alloc_msize);
> > +	p9_fcall_init(c, &req->rc, 1, alloc_msize);
> 
> 
> mempool allocation never fails, correct?
> 
> (don't think this needs a comment, just making sure here)

As long as GFP_WAIT is included, yes

> This all looks good to me, will queue it up in my -next branch after
> running some tests next weekend and hopefully submit when 5.20 opens
> with the code making smaller allocs more common.

Sounds good!