linux-next: bad commits in the v9fs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Jun 13 2022 - 17:52:31 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[arm-integrator:kernel-in-vmalloc-v5.19-rc1 27/33] arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:237:9: error: call to undeclared function 'WARN_ON'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Hide SEV migration lockdep goo behind CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC"
Next in thread: Dominique Martinet: "Re: linux-next: bad commits in the v9fs tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,

Commits

04608d78b66c ("Linux 5.19-rc1")
9383b9134c66 ("fix the breakage in close_fd_get_file() calling conventions change")

look like they were rebased or cherry-picked from Linus' tree.from
Linus' tree. From commits f2906aa86338 and 40a1926022d1 respectively.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpGBmdqkawXz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: kernel test robot: "[arm-integrator:kernel-in-vmalloc-v5.19-rc1 27/33] arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:237:9: error: call to undeclared function 'WARN_ON'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Hide SEV migration lockdep goo behind CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC"
Next in thread: Dominique Martinet: "Re: linux-next: bad commits in the v9fs tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]