Re: [RFC PATCHES 1/2] iommu: Add RCU-protected page free support

From: Baolu Lu
Date: Fri Jun 10 2022 - 02:05:47 EST


On 2022/6/10 01:06, Raj, Ashok wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:08:10PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
The IOMMU page tables are updated using iommu_map/unmap() interfaces.
Currently, there is no mandatory requirement for drivers to use locks
to ensure concurrent updates to page tables, because it's assumed that
overlapping IOVA ranges do not have concurrent updates. Therefore the
IOMMU drivers only need to take care of concurrent updates to level
page table entries.

The last part doesn't read well..
s/updates to level page table entries/ updates to page-table entries at the
same level


But enabling new features challenges this assumption. For example, the
hardware assisted dirty page tracking feature requires scanning page
tables in interfaces other than mapping and unmapping. This might result
in a use-after-free scenario in which a level page table has been freed
by the unmap() interface, while another thread is scanning the next level
page table.

This adds RCU-protected page free support so that the pages are really
freed and reused after a RCU grace period. Hence, the page tables are
safe for scanning within a rcu_read_lock critical region. Considering
that scanning the page table is a rare case, this also adds a domain
flag and the RCU-protected page free is only used when this flat is set.

s/flat/flag

Above updated. Thank you!


Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/iommu.h | 9 +++++++++
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
index 5e1afe169549..6f68eabb8567 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct iommu_domain {
void *handler_token;
struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
struct iommu_dma_cookie *iova_cookie;
+ unsigned long concurrent_traversal:1;

Does this need to be a bitfield? Even though you are needing just one bit
now, you can probably make have maskbits?


As discussed in another reply, I am about to drop the driver opt-in and
wrapper the helper around the iommu_iotlb_gather.


};
static inline bool iommu_is_dma_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
@@ -657,6 +658,12 @@ static inline void dev_iommu_priv_set(struct device *dev, void *priv)
dev->iommu->priv = priv;
}
+static inline void domain_set_concurrent_traversal(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ bool value)
+{
+ domain->concurrent_traversal = value;
+}
+
int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev);
void iommu_release_device(struct device *dev);
@@ -677,6 +684,8 @@ int iommu_group_claim_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group, void *owner);
void iommu_group_release_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group);
bool iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(struct iommu_group *group);
+void iommu_free_pgtbl_pages(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct list_head *pages);
#else /* CONFIG_IOMMU_API */
struct iommu_ops {};
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 847ad47a2dfd..ceeb97ebe3e2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -3252,3 +3252,26 @@ bool iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(struct iommu_group *group)
return user;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed);
+
+static void pgtble_page_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)

maybe the names can be consistent? pgtble_ vs pgtbl below.

vote to drop the 'e' :-)

Updated.


+{
+ struct page *page = container_of(rcu, struct page, rcu_head);
+
+ __free_pages(page, 0);
+}
+
+void iommu_free_pgtbl_pages(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct list_head *pages)
+{
+ struct page *page, *next;
+
+ if (!domain->concurrent_traversal) {
+ put_pages_list(pages);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, pages, lru) {
+ list_del(&page->lru);
+ call_rcu(&page->rcu_head, pgtble_page_free_rcu);
+ }
+}
--
2.25.1


Best regards,
baolu