Re: [PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v3

[Qian Cai]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Do you think it's related to the series and if so why? From the warning,
> it's not obvious to me why it would be given that it's a warning about a
> task not being inactive when it is expected to be.

I don't know. I just saw the 6/6 patch touched the mm_percpu_wq. Anyway,
I'll spend more time to reproduce, and see if we are lucky.