Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Add FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET to avoid adding weak functions

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 26 May 2022 10:05:30 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 May 2022 10:38:10 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > If an unused weak function was traced, it's call to fentry will still
> > exist, which gets added into the __mcount_loc table. Ftrace will use
> > kallsyms to retrieve the name for each location in __mcount_loc to display
> > it in the available_filter_functions and used to enable functions via the
> > name matching in set_ftrace_filter/notrace. Enabling these functions do
> > nothing but enable an unused call to ftrace_caller. If a traced weak
> > function is overridden, the symbol of the function would be used for it,
> > which will either created duplicate names, or if the previous function was
> > not traced, it would be incorrectly listed in available_filter_functions
> > as a function that can be traced.  
> 
> This might be dependent on binutils version.  In some situations the
> unused __weak function might be dropped altogether.  This change
> (https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=d1bcae833b32f1)
> tripped up recordmcount
> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220518181828.645877-1-naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u).
> 
> The kexec fix will be to just give up on using __weak.

Yes that's as separate issue with weak functions. Which reminds me, I told
Jon Corbet I would write up an article about the problems of weak functions
and ftrace ;-)

-- Steve