Re: [PATCH v8 17/22] vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks

[Matthew Rosato]

On 5/24/22 5:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:59:02PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > During vfio-pci open_device, pass the KVM associated with the vfio group
> > (if one exists).  This is needed in order to pass a special indicator
> > (GISA) to firmware to allow zPCI interpretation facilities to be used
> > for only the specific KVM associated with the vfio-pci device.  During
> > vfio-pci close_device, unregister the notifier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >   arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h      |  2 ++
> >   drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >   drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h    | 12 ++++++++++++
> >   4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
> > index 85eb0ef9d4c3..67fbce1ea0c9 100644
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/pci.h>
> >   #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >   #include <linux/iommu.h>
> > +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> >   #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
> >   #include <asm-generic/pci.h>
> >   #include <asm/pci_clp.h>
> > @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ struct zpci_dev {
> >   	struct s390_domain *s390_domain; /* s390 IOMMU domain data */
> >   	struct kvm_zdev *kzdev;
> >   	struct mutex kzdev_lock;
> > +	struct notifier_block nb; /* vfio notifications */
>
> This is obsolete now right? Same for the #include ?

Of course, I forgot to remove them...  Will do

> > @@ -418,6 +424,9 @@ void vfio_pci_core_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> >   
> >   	vdev->needs_reset = true;
> >   
> > +	if (vfio_pci_zdev_release(vdev))
> > +		pci_info(pdev, "%s: Couldn't restore zPCI state\n", __func__);
> > +
> >   	/*
> >   	 * If we have saved state, restore it.  If we can reset the device,
> >   	 * even better.  Resetting with current state seems better than
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c
> > index ea4c0d2b0663..d0df85c8b204 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >   #include <linux/vfio.h>
> >   #include <linux/vfio_zdev.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> >   #include <asm/pci_clp.h>
> >   #include <asm/pci_io.h>
> >   
> > @@ -136,3 +137,29 @@ int vfio_pci_info_zdev_add_caps(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> >   
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > +
> > +int vfio_pci_zdev_open(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(vdev->pdev);
> > +
> > +	if (!zdev)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	if (!vdev->vdev.kvm)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return kvm_s390_pci_register_kvm(zdev, vdev->vdev.kvm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int vfio_pci_zdev_release(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(vdev->pdev);
>
> Keeping these functions named open_device/close_device wouuld probably
> be clearer

Agreed, will rename vfio_pci_zdev_{open,close}_device

> > +	if (!zdev)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	if (!vdev->vdev.kvm)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return kvm_s390_pci_unregister_kvm(zdev);
> > +}
>
> Again this cannot fail, you should make it return void, not ignore the
> failure - or at least push the ignoring the failure down to the place
> that is causing this.

I'll move that handling into kvm_s390_pci_unregister_kvm and make 
vfio_pci_zdev_close_device return void / will remove the check for the 
rc in vfio_pci_core_disable.

> Otherwise it looks fine to me, thanks

Thanks