Re: [PATCH] ASoC: stm32: sai: Use of_device_get_match_data() tosimplify code

From: Olivier MOYSAN
Date: Tue May 24 2022 - 10:32:04 EST


Hi Tang,

On 5/24/22 03:44, tangbin wrote:
Hi Mark & Olivier:

On 2022/5/24 2:57, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:

The current patch requires a change in the driver.
Either changing STM_SAI_x_ID enums, or replacing data by a struct.
For instance:
struct stm32_sai_comp_data {
    unsigned int id;
}
struct stm32_sai_comp_data stm32_sai_comp_data_a = {
    .id = STM_SAI_A_ID;
}
struct of_device_id stm32_sai_sub_ids[] = {
    .data = &stm32_sai_comp_data_a},
}
Either approach works for me (or a revert for that matter).

    Thanks for your advice, I was thoughtless.

    I think change the date of STM_SAI_x_ID maybe simple. But if we don't change the id,

what about add a "#define" like the line 47:

#define STM_SAI_IS_SUB(x) ((x)->id == STM_SAI_A_ID || (x)->id == STM_SAI_B_ID)

then in the judgement, wu use:

    sai->id = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);

    if (!STM_SAI_IS_SUB(sai))

            return -EINVAL;


if you think that's ok, I will send patch v2 for you .


If we allow null value in STM_SAI_IS_SUB(sai) check, we can miss real NULL pointer error from of_device_get_match_data().

The simplest way is to change STM_SAI_x_ID enums I think.
But honnestly, I feel more comfortable to let the driver unchanged.

BRs
Olivier

Thanks

Tang Bin