Re: [BUG report] security_inode_alloc return -ENOMEM let xfs shutdown

From: Jackie Liu
Date: Mon May 23 2022 - 20:52:47 EST




在 2022/5/24 上午7:20, Dave Chinner 写道:
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 04:51:50PM +0800, Jackie Liu wrote:
Hello Maintainer and developer.

Syzkaller report an filesystem shutdown for me, It's very easy to
trigger and also exists on the latest kernel version 5.18-rc7.

Shutdown is a perfectly reasonable way to handle a failure that we
can't recover cleanly from.

dmesg shows:

[ 285.725893] FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
[ 285.729625] CPU: 7 PID: 18034 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.19.90-43+
#7
[ 285.731420] Source Version: b62cabdd86181d386998660ebf34ca653addd6c9
[ 285.733051] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0
02/06/2015
[ 285.734796] Call trace:
[ 285.735614] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3e0
[ 285.736609] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
[ 285.737525] dump_stack+0x164/0x1fc
[ 285.738489] should_fail+0x5c0/0x688
[ 285.739555] __should_failslab+0x118/0x180
[ 285.740725] should_failslab+0x2c/0x78
[ 285.741808] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x270/0x410
[ 285.743120] security_inode_alloc+0x100/0x1a8
[ 285.744356] inode_init_always+0x48c/0xa28
[ 285.745524] xfs_iget_cache_hit+0x9c0/0x2f28
[ 285.746739] xfs_iget+0x33c/0x9e0
[ 285.747708] xfs_ialloc+0x218/0x11c0
[ 285.748752] xfs_dir_ialloc+0xe8/0x480
[ 285.749832] xfs_create+0x5bc/0x1220
[ 285.750871] xfs_generic_create+0x42c/0x568
[ 285.752053] xfs_vn_mknod+0x48/0x58
[ 285.753067] xfs_vn_create+0x40/0x50
[ 285.754106] lookup_open+0x960/0x1580
[ 285.755176] do_last+0xd44/0x2180
[ 285.756149] path_openat+0x1a0/0x6d0
[ 285.757187] do_filp_open+0x14c/0x208
[ 285.758245] do_sys_open+0x340/0x470
[ 285.759289] __arm64_sys_openat+0x98/0xd8
[ 285.760438] el0_svc_common+0x230/0x3f0
[ 285.761541] el0_svc_handler+0x144/0x1a8
[ 285.762674] el0_svc+0x8/0x1b0
[ 285.763737] security_inode_alloc:796
[ 285.764733] inode_init_always:202
[ 285.765669] xfs_create:1213
[ 285.766485] XFS (dm-0): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1046 of
file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller xfs_create+0x700/0x1220
[ 285.769503] CPU: 7 PID: 18034 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.19.90-43+
#7
[ 285.771275] Source Version: b62cabdd86181d386998660ebf34ca653addd6c9
[ 285.772892] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0
02/06/2015
[ 285.774625] Call trace:
[ 285.775335] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3e0
[ 285.776324] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
[ 285.777236] dump_stack+0x164/0x1fc
[ 285.778188] xfs_error_report+0xdc/0xe0
[ 285.779292] xfs_trans_cancel+0x490/0x878
[ 285.780439] xfs_create+0x700/0x1220
[ 285.781477] xfs_generic_create+0x42c/0x568
[ 285.782673] xfs_vn_mknod+0x48/0x58
[ 285.783687] xfs_vn_create+0x40/0x50
[ 285.784724] lookup_open+0x960/0x1580
[ 285.785782] do_last+0xd44/0x2180
[ 285.786760] path_openat+0x1a0/0x6d0
[ 285.787791] do_filp_open+0x14c/0x208
[ 285.788844] do_sys_open+0x340/0x470
[ 285.789880] __arm64_sys_openat+0x98/0xd8
[ 285.791039] el0_svc_common+0x230/0x3f0
[ 285.792139] el0_svc_handler+0x144/0x1a8
[ 285.793260] el0_svc+0x8/0x1b0
[ 285.794283] XFS (dm-0): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 1047
of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Return address = 00000000a4a366b9
[ 285.816187] XFS (dm-0): Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting
down filesystem
[ 285.818476] XFS (dm-0): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the
problem(s)

Yup, that's a shutdown with a dirty transaction because memory
allocation failed in the middle of a transaction. XFS can not
tolerate memory allocation failure within the scope of a dirty
transactions and, in practice, this almost never happens. Indeed,
I've never seen this allocation from security_inode_alloc():

int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
{
if (!lsm_inode_cache) {
inode->i_security = NULL;
return 0;
}

inode->i_security = kmem_cache_zalloc(lsm_inode_cache, GFP_NOFS);
if (inode->i_security == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}

fail in all my OOM testing. Hence, to me, this is a theoretical
failure as I've never, ever seen this allocation fail in production
or test systems, even when driving them hard into OOM with excessive
inode allocation and triggering the OOM killer repeatedly until the
system kills init....

Hence I don't think there's anything we need to change here right
now. If users start hitting this, then we're going to have add new
memalloc_nofail_save/restore() functionality to XFS transaction
contexts. But until then, I don't think we need to worry about
syzkaller intentionally hitting this shutdown.

Thanks Dave.

In the actual test, the x86 or arm64 device test will trigger this error more easily when FAILSLAB is turned on. After our internal discussion, we can try again through such a patch. Anyway, thank you for your reply.

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index ceee27b70384..360304409c0c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
wake_up_bit(&ip->i_flags, __XFS_INEW_BIT);
ASSERT(ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
trace_xfs_iget_reclaim_fail(ip);
+ error = -EAGAIN;
goto out_error;
}

@@ -503,7 +504,7 @@ xfs_iget_cache_miss(

ip = xfs_inode_alloc(mp, ino);
if (!ip)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -EAGAIN;

error = xfs_iread(mp, tp, ip, flags);
if (error)


--
BR, Jackie Liu


Cheers,

Dave.