[PATCH 5.15 018/132] Revert "drm/i915/opregion: check port number bounds for SWSCI display power state"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>

This reverts commit b84857c06ef9e72d09fadafdbb3ce9af64af954f.

5.10 stable contains 2 identical commits:
1. commit eb7bf11e8ef1 ("drm/i915/opregion: check port number bounds for SWSCI display power state")
2. commit b84857c06ef9 ("drm/i915/opregion: check port number bounds for SWSCI display power state")

Both commits add separate checks for the same condition. Revert the 2nd
redundant check to match upstream, which only has one check.

Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c |   15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
@@ -376,21 +376,6 @@ int intel_opregion_notify_encoder(struct
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * The port numbering and mapping here is bizarre. The now-obsolete
-	 * swsci spec supports ports numbered [0..4]. Port E is handled as a
-	 * special case, but port F and beyond are not. The functionality is
-	 * supposed to be obsolete for new platforms. Just bail out if the port
-	 * number is out of bounds after mapping.
-	 */
-	if (port > 4) {
-		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
-			    "[ENCODER:%d:%s] port %c (index %u) out of bounds for display power state notification\n",
-			    intel_encoder->base.base.id, intel_encoder->base.name,
-			    port_name(intel_encoder->port), port);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	if (!enable)
 		parm |= 4 << 8;