Re: [PATCH V12 7/9] regulator: Add a regulator driver for the PM8008 PMIC

From: Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)
Date: Thu May 19 2022 - 08:06:55 EST



On 5/17/2022 12:33 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Satya Priya (2022-05-11 06:18:31)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0361f02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-pm8008-regulator.c
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Copyright (c) 2022, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
Is this include used?


This is used for of_property_read_* APIs.


+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
Is this include used?


This is not required, I will remove this.


+
+#define VSET_STEP_MV 8
+#define VSET_STEP_UV (VSET_STEP_MV * 1000)
+
+#define LDO_ENABLE_REG(base) ((base) + 0x46)
+#define ENABLE_BIT BIT(7)
+
+#define LDO_VSET_LB_REG(base) ((base) + 0x40)
+
+#define LDO_STEPPER_CTL_REG(base) ((base) + 0x3b)
+#define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_STEPPER_RATE 38400
+#define STEP_RATE_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+
+struct pm8008_regulator_data {
+ const char *name;
+ const char *supply_name;
+ int min_uv;
+ int max_uv;
+ int min_dropout_uv;
+ const struct linear_range *voltage_range;
+};
+
+struct pm8008_regulator {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct regulator_desc rdesc;
+ u16 base;
+ int step_rate;
+ int voltage_selector;
+};
+
+static const struct linear_range nldo_ranges[] = {
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(528000, 0, 122, 8000),
+};
+
+static const struct linear_range pldo_ranges[] = {
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1504000, 0, 237, 8000),
+};
+
+static const struct pm8008_regulator_data reg_data[] = {
+ /* name parent min_uv max_uv headroom_uv voltage_range */
+ { "ldo1", "vdd_l1_l2", 528000, 1504000, 225000, nldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo2", "vdd_l1_l2", 528000, 1504000, 225000, nldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo3", "vdd_l3_l4", 1504000, 3400000, 300000, pldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo4", "vdd_l3_l4", 1504000, 3400000, 300000, pldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo5", "vdd_l5", 1504000, 3400000, 200000, pldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo6", "vdd_l6", 1504000, 3400000, 200000, pldo_ranges, },
+ { "ldo7", "vdd_l7", 1504000, 3400000, 200000, pldo_ranges, },
+};
+
+static int pm8008_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+ return pm8008_reg->voltage_selector;
+}
+
+static inline int pm8008_write_voltage(struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg,
+ int mV)
+{
+ __le16 vset_raw;
+
+ vset_raw = cpu_to_le16(mV);
+
+ return regmap_bulk_write(pm8008_reg->regmap,
+ LDO_VSET_LB_REG(pm8008_reg->base),
+ (const void *)&vset_raw, sizeof(vset_raw));
Does sparse complain about casting away __le16?


No.


+}
+
+static int pm8008_regulator_set_voltage_time(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ int old_uV, int new_uv)
+{
+ struct pm8008_regulator *pm8008_reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+ return DIV_ROUND_UP(abs(new_uv - old_uV), pm8008_reg->step_rate);
+}
+