Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the loongarch tree

[Huacai Chen]

Hi, Stephen,

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:04 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 11:00:08 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 19 May 2022 10:54:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > >  +  u32 count;
> > >  +};
> > >  +
> > >  +/* LPC Interrupt Controller */
> > >  +
> > >  +struct acpi_madt_lpc_pic {
> > >  +  struct acpi_subtable_header header;
> > >  +  u8 version;
> > >  +  u64 address;
> > >  +  u16 size;
> > >  +  u8 cascade;
> > > ++
> > > + /* 17: OEM data */
> > > +
> > > + struct acpi_madt_oem_data {
> > > +   u8 oem_data[0];
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /*
> >
> > I missed adding the closing brace after struct acpi_madt_lpc_pic.  I
> > have added that to my resolution now.
>
> Not a good morning :-( I also forgot the comma after
> "ACPI_MADT_TYPE_RESERVED = 24".  Added now.
As you said before, my tree lacks a MAINTAINERS entry, can I rebase my
tree to fix that now? Or is it too late?

Huacai
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell