Re: [PATCH 0/4] memcontrol selftests fixups
From: Michal Koutný
Date: Wed May 18 2022 - 12:28:15 EST
Apologies for spam due to botched sending.
Please disregard this (old) series.
The replacement should come in
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx
(That one is also not 100% correct, it's missing a Subject: therefore
may not be pass through some filters.)
The 1st patch of that v2 series is at
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx/
And I copy the cover letter here to be sure (and not to spam even more).
---->----
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] memcontrol selftests fixups
Hello.
I'm just flushing the patches to make memcontrol selftests check the
events behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails).
(test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present
even before the refactoring.)
The two bigger changes are:
- adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given
tolerance,
- both test_memcg_low and test_memcg_min check protection of memory in
populated cgroups (actually as per Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
memory.min should not apply to empty cgroups, which is not the case
currently. Therefore I unified tests with the populated case in order to to
bring more broken tests).
Thanks,
Michal
Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513171811.730-1-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx/)
- fixed mis-rebase in compilation fix patch,
- added review, ack tags from v1,
- applied feedback from v1 (Octave script in git tree),
- added one more patch extracting common parts,
- rebased on mm-stable bbe832b9db2e.
----<----