Re: [PATCHv2 net] bonding: fix missed rcu protection

From: Jonathan Toppins
Date: Tue May 17 2022 - 13:33:32 EST


Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
RESEND, list still didn't receive my last version

The diffstat is slightly larger but IMO a slightly more readable version.
When I was reading v2 I found myself jumping around.
I only compile tested it, so YMMV.

If this amount of change is too much v2 from Hangbin looks correct to
me.

drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 38e152548126..f9d27b63c454 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -5591,23 +5591,32 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_ts_info(struct net_device *bond_dev,
const struct ethtool_ops *ops;
struct net_device *real_dev;
struct phy_device *phydev;
+ int ret = 0;

+ rcu_read_lock();
real_dev = bond_option_active_slave_get_rcu(bond);
- if (real_dev) {
- ops = real_dev->ethtool_ops;
- phydev = real_dev->phydev;
-
- if (phy_has_tsinfo(phydev)) {
- return phy_ts_info(phydev, info);
- } else if (ops->get_ts_info) {
- return ops->get_ts_info(real_dev, info);
- }
- }
+ if (real_dev)
+ dev_hold(real_dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (!real_dev)
+ goto software;

+ ops = real_dev->ethtool_ops;
+ phydev = real_dev->phydev;
+
+ if (phy_has_tsinfo(phydev))
+ ret = phy_ts_info(phydev, info);
+ else if (ops->get_ts_info)
+ ret = ops->get_ts_info(real_dev, info);
+
+ dev_put(real_dev);
+ return ret;
+
+software:
info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
info->phc_index = -1;
-
return 0;
}

--
2.27.0