RE: [RFC PATCH v2 20/21] x86: Add support for CONFIG_CFI_CLANG

[David Laight]

From: Sami Tolvanen
> Sent: 16 May 2022 23:03
> 
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 2:44 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:32:55PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > > > The compiler always generates this specific instruction sequence.
> > >
> > > Yes, but there are several ways to encode 'cmpl imm,-6(reg)'.
> >
> > Yes, but we don't care. This *always* uses the 32bit immediate form.
> > Even if the immediate is small.
> 
> Yes, that part is not a problem, but it's a valid point that LLVM
> might not always use r8-r15 here, so I will have to check for the REX
> prefix before blindly attempting to decode the instruction.

Are you allowing for the REX prefix at all?
The encoding of:
> > > +      *   cmpl    <id>, -6(%reg)     ; 7 bytes
is
	<opcode><mod/TTT/rm><off8><imm32>
which is 7 bytes without the REX.
If reg is r11 there is an extra REX byte - for 8 in total.

Without the REX byte the decode will be using %bx.
So the testing should all have failed.
Which means that something else is wrong as well.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)