RE: [EXT] [PATCH 2/2] octeon_ep: Fix irq releasing in the error handling path of octep_request_irqs()

From: Veerasenareddy Burru
Date: Mon May 16 2022 - 18:14:29 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2022 8:57 AM
> To: Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Abhijit Ayarekar
> <aayarekar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Satananda Burla <sburla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH 2/2] octeon_ep: Fix irq releasing in the error handling
> path of octep_request_irqs()
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For the error handling to work as expected, the index in the 'oct-
> >msix_entries' array must be tweaked because, when the irq are requested
> there is:
> msix_entry = &oct->msix_entries[i + num_non_ioq_msix];
>
> So in the error handling path, 'i + num_non_ioq_msix' should be used instead
> of 'i'.
>
> The 2nd argument of free_irq() also needs to be adjusted.
>
> Fixes: 37d79d059606 ("octeon_ep: add Tx/Rx processing and interrupt
> support")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I think that the wording above is awful, but I'm sure you get it.
> Feel free to rephrase everything to have it more readable.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> index 6b60a03574a0..4dcae805422b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> @@ -257,10 +257,12 @@ static int octep_request_irqs(struct octep_device
> *oct)
>
> return 0;
> ioq_irq_err:
> + i += num_non_ioq_msix;
> while (i > num_non_ioq_msix) {
> --i;
> irq_set_affinity_hint(oct->msix_entries[i].vector, NULL);
> - free_irq(oct->msix_entries[i].vector, oct->ioq_vector[i]);
> + free_irq(oct->msix_entries[i].vector,
> + oct->ioq_vector[i - num_non_ioq_msix]);
Ack.
Thanks for the fix.

Regards,
Veerasenareddy.
> }
> non_ioq_irq_err:
> while (i) {
> --
> 2.34.1