Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Extend fixed-partitions binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/05/2022 17:34, Mikhail Zhilkin wrote:
> Hi, Miquel!
> 
> On 5/16/2022 11:21 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 13 May 2022 09:12:03 -0500:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:27 AM Miquel Raynal
>>> <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 15:50:07 UTC, Mikhail Zhilkin wrote:  
>>>>> Extend fixed-partitions binding for support of Sercomm partition parser
>>>>> (add "sercomm,sc-partitions" compatible).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zhilkin <csharper2005@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>  
>>>> Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.  
>>> Patch 1 is a dependency, please apply it too. Without it, we now get
>>> in linux-next:
>> Only patch 3 was sent to me/the mtd ML. I'll drop the patch.
>>
>> Mikhail, please resend the series including us on all your patches.
> 
> Done! I sent the series to you and mtd
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220516151228.885222-1-csharper2005@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> 
> P.S. get_maintainer.pl didn't recommend to add you and mtd that and this
> time. Do I need to send each patch from the series to all maintainers of
> all the patches in the future?

Yes, entire patchset should be sent to the same folks, same maintainers.
Otherwise maintainer should assume patches are independent, which is not
true.

Exception is for large patchsets where we do not want to spam everyone
and these require different approaches. It's not the case here.


Best regards,
Krzysztof