Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Generic Ticket Spinlocks

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Thu, 05 May 2022 04:09:46 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:36 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Comments on the v3 looked pretty straight-forward, essentially just that
> > RCsc issue I'd missed from the v2 and some cleanups.  A part of the
> > discussion some additional possible cleanups came up related to the
> > qrwlock headers, but I hadn't looked at those yet and I had already
> > handled everything else.  This went on the back burner, but given that
> > LoongArch appears to want to use it for their new port I think it's best
> > to just run with this and defer the other cleanups until later.
> >
> > I've placed the whole patch set at palmer/tspinlock-v4, and also tagged
> > the asm-generic bits as generic-ticket-spinlocks-v4.  Ideally I'd like
> > to take that, along with the RISC-V patches, into my tree as there's
> > some RISC-V specific testing before things land in linux-next.  This
> > passes all my testing, but I'll hold off until merging things anywhere
> > else to make sure everyone has time to look.  There's no rush on my end
> > for this one, but I don't want to block LoongArch so I'll try to stay a
> > bit more on top of this one.
>
> I took another look as well and everything seems fine. I had expected
> that I would merge it into the asm-generic tree first and did not bother
> sending a separate Reviewed-by tag, but I agree that it's best if you
> create the branch.
>
> Can you add 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>'
> to each patch and send me a pull request for a v5 tag so we can
> merge that into both the riscv and the asm-generic trees?

Yep.  There were some other minor comments, I'll clean those up as well 
and send something soon.