Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Thu May 05 2022 - 23:23:03 EST

Next message: Leizhen (ThunderTown): "Re: [PATCH v23 3/6] arm64: kdump: Reimplement crashkernel=X"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[timekeeping] 3aeaac747d: PANIC:early_exception"
In reply to: Rex-BC Chen: "Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support"
Next in thread: Viresh Kumar: "Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:56 AM Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 19:52 +0800, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> > From this opp notifier, cpufreq should listen to opp notification and
> > do
>
> Hello Viresh,
>
> There is still ">" in this patch...
> I think the root cause could be the "From" word in the beginning of
> this message.
> I will not use "From" in next version..

Could this be a bug in lore?

I'm not seeing this extra ">" in either the email in my inbox, viewed
raw, nor the patch downloaded from patchwork [1].

ChenYu

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220505115226.20130-6-rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx/mbox/

>
> BRs,
> Rex
>
> > proper actions when receiving events of disable and voltage
> > adjustment.
> >
> > One of the user for this opp notifier is MediaTek SVS.
> > The MediaTek Smart Voltage Scaling (SVS) is a hardware which
> > calculates
> > suitable SVS bank voltages to OPP voltage table.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew-sh.Cheng <andrew-sh.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > index fe205eca657d..06d80ee06bbf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> > int intermediate_voltage;
> > bool need_voltage_tracking;
> > int pre_vproc;
> > + /* Avoid race condition for regulators between notify and
> > policy */
> > + struct mutex reg_lock;
> > + struct notifier_block opp_nb;
> > + unsigned int opp_cpu;
> > + unsigned long opp_freq;
> > const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
> > int vtrack_max;
> > };
> > @@ -182,6 +187,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >
> > pre_freq_hz = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk);
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&info->reg_lock);
> > +
> > if (unlikely(info->pre_vproc <= 0))
> > pre_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(info->proc_reg);
> > else
> > @@ -214,7 +221,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > dev_err(cpu_dev,
> > "cpu%d: failed to scale up voltage!\n",
> > policy->cpu);
> > mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, pre_vproc);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -224,8 +231,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > dev_err(cpu_dev,
> > "cpu%d: failed to re-parent cpu clock!\n",
> > policy->cpu);
> > mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, pre_vproc);
> > - WARN_ON(1);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > /* Set the original PLL to target rate. */
> > @@ -235,7 +241,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > "cpu%d: failed to scale cpu clock rate!\n",
> > policy->cpu);
> > clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, armpll);
> > mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, pre_vproc);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > /* Set parent of CPU clock back to the original PLL. */
> > @@ -244,8 +250,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > dev_err(cpu_dev,
> > "cpu%d: failed to re-parent cpu clock!\n",
> > policy->cpu);
> > mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, inter_vproc);
> > - WARN_ON(1);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -260,15 +265,72 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, info->inter_clk);
> > clk_set_rate(armpll, pre_freq_hz);
> > clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, armpll);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + info->opp_freq = freq_hz;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&info->reg_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > #define DYNAMIC_POWER "dynamic-power-coefficient"
> >
> > +static int mtk_cpufreq_opp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > + unsigned long event, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct dev_pm_opp *opp = data;
> > + struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
> > + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> > + unsigned long freq, volt;
> > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + info = container_of(nb, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, opp_nb);
> > +
> > + if (event == OPP_EVENT_ADJUST_VOLTAGE) {
> > + freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&info->reg_lock);
> > + if (info->opp_freq == freq) {
> > + volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp);
> > + ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, volt);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
> > + "failed to scale voltage:
> > %d\n", ret);
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&info->reg_lock);
> > + } else if (event == OPP_EVENT_DISABLE) {
> > + freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
> > +
> > + /* case of current opp item is disabled */
> > + if (info->opp_freq == freq) {
> > + freq = 1;
> > + new_opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(info-
> > >cpu_dev,
> > + &freq);
> > + if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
> > + dev_err(info->cpu_dev,
> > + "all opp items are
> > disabled\n");
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(new_opp);
> > + return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
> > + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(info->opp_cpu);
> > + if (policy) {
> > + cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq /
> > 1000,
> > + CPUFREQ_RELATION_
> > L);
> > + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> > int cpu)
> > {
> > struct device *cpu_dev;
> > @@ -357,6 +419,18 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
> > info->intermediate_voltage = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp);
> > dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> >
> > + mutex_init(&info->reg_lock);
> > +
> > + info->opp_cpu = cpu;
> > + info->opp_nb.notifier_call = mtk_cpufreq_opp_notifier;
> > + ret = dev_pm_opp_register_notifier(cpu_dev, &info->opp_nb);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(cpu_dev, "cpu%d: failed to register opp
> > notifier\n", cpu);
> > + goto out_disable_inter_clock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + info->opp_freq = clk_get_rate(info->cpu_clk);
> > +
> > /*
> > * If SRAM regulator is present, software "voltage tracking" is
> > needed
> > * for this CPU power domain.
> > @@ -421,6 +495,7 @@ static void mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info)
> > }
> >
> > dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(&info->cpus);
> > + dev_pm_opp_unregister_notifier(info->cpu_dev, &info->opp_nb);
> > }
> >
> > static int mtk_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

Next message: Leizhen (ThunderTown): "Re: [PATCH v23 3/6] arm64: kdump: Reimplement crashkernel=X"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[timekeeping] 3aeaac747d: PANIC:early_exception"
In reply to: Rex-BC Chen: "Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support"
Next in thread: Viresh Kumar: "Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]