Re: [RFC v2 30/39] scsi: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:34:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:42 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:50:51PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > those drivers using them.
> >
> > Some of these drivers support devices using either I/O ports or MMIO.
> > Adding the HAS_IOPORT dependency means MMIO devices that *could* work
> > on systems without I/O ports, won't work.
> >
> > Even the MMIO-only devices are probably old and not of much interest.
> > But if you want to disable them even though they *could* work, I think
> > that's worth mentioning in the commit log.
> 
> I think this would again make more sense with the original CONFIG_LEGACY_PCI
> conditional than the generic HAS_IOPORT one. I don't remember what the
> objection was to that symbol.

I didn't really like CONFIG_LEGACY_PCI because it wasn't clearly
defined.