Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] net: ethernet: ocelot: remove the need for num_stats initializer

From: Colin Foster
Date: Sat Apr 30 2022 - 13:47:56 EST


Hi Vladimir,

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 03:15:31PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 02:30:36PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > There is a desire to share the oclot_stats_layout struct outside of the
> > current vsc7514 driver. In order to do so, the length of the array needs to
> > be known at compile time, and defined in the struct ocelot and struct
> > felix_info.
> >
> > Since the array is defined in a .c file and would be declared in the header
> > file via:
> > extern struct ocelot_stat_layout[];
> > the size of the array will not be known at compile time to outside modules.
> >
> > To fix this, remove the need for defining the number of stats at compile
> > time and allow this number to be determined at initialization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > index 9b4e6c78d0f4..5c4f57cfa785 100644
> > --- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > +++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> > @@ -105,6 +105,13 @@
> > #define REG_RESERVED_ADDR 0xffffffff
> > #define REG_RESERVED(reg) REG(reg, REG_RESERVED_ADDR)
> >
> > +#define OCELOT_STAT_FLAG_END BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define for_each_stat(ocelot, stat) \
> > + for ((stat) = ocelot->stats_layout; \
> > + !((stat)->flags & OCELOT_STAT_FLAG_END); \
> > + (stat)++)
> > +
> > enum ocelot_target {
> > ANA = 1,
> > QS,
> > @@ -535,9 +542,12 @@ enum ocelot_ptp_pins {
> >
> > struct ocelot_stat_layout {
> > u32 offset;
> > + u32 flags;
>
> Was it really necessary to add an extra u32 to struct ocelot_stat_layout?
> Couldn't you check for the end of stats by looking at stat->name[0] and
> comparing against the null terminator, for an empty string?

I considered this as well. I could either have explicitly added the
flags field, as I did, or implicitly looked for .name == NULL (or
name[0] == '\0' as you suggest).

I figured it might be better to make this an explicit relationship by
way of flags - but I'm happy to change OCELOT_STAT_END and for_each_stat
to rely on .name if you prefer.

>
> > char name[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> > };
> >
> > +#define OCELOT_STAT_END { .flags = OCELOT_STAT_FLAG_END }
> > +
> > struct ocelot_stats_region {
> > struct list_head node;
> > u32 offset;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >